Nonprofits may engage in advocacy and limited lobbying, but few do so – new research
A nationally representative survey found that the share of nonprofits aware of their right to support or oppose legislation has fallen by more than half in the past 20 years.
The Research Brief is a short take about interesting academic work.
The big idea
Fewer than a third of charities in the U.S. (31%) engaged in advocacy in the last five years. This represents a dramatic decline in the past two decades, we found, even though the law allows these groups to speak up regarding the issues that affect the people they serve.
The results of the Public Engagement Nonprofit Survey, a new nationally representative study we conducted on behalf of Independent Sector – a coalition of nonprofits, foundations and corporate giving programs – indicate that many charities don’t engage in policy discussions because they don’t fully understand the rules governing those activities.
We are scholars of nonprofits who conduct research regarding nonprofits. The executive directors of about 2,300 nationally representative nonprofits completed this survey during the second half of 2022.
Along with finding that only 3 in 10 nonprofits engage in policy advocacy, we found that only 25% report ever formally lobbying government, compared with 74% that ever lobbied in 2000 – and this is heavily related to not knowing that they can. In 2000, the last time a similar survey was conducted, 73% of charities knew they had the right to support or oppose legislation, compared with only 32% who know that today.
Why it matters
We were surprised to see such a sharp decline in nonprofit advocacy, despite ongoing educational efforts around advocacy by national and state associations of nonprofits and others since 2000.
All charities, officially known as 501(c)3 nonprofits due to the portion of the U.S. tax code that defines their obligations, may legally speak out regarding public issues in an effort to influence local, state and national government decisions. There are roughly 1.5 million nonprofits of this kind in the U.S., including food banks, homeless shelters, day care centers and arts organizations.
It can be vital for the advancement of their missions that charities exercise this right. For example, after-school programs can encourage staff members and volunteers to address school board members and other local officials, state representatives – and even members of Congress. They can suggest ideas for new rules, laws or funding that would help the children they serve.
The rules for how nonprofits can advocate are more flexible than many people believe. Nonprofits can raise awareness about issues affecting the people they serve, and they can also lobby by directly reaching out to public officials about legislation. As long as nonprofit employees don’t spend too much time out of their day – meaning that doing so does not become a major part of their daily activities – and don’t use government money for lobbying, they’re complying with the law.
While how much is “too much time” is unclear, charities can file a simple one-page form with the IRS, called the 501(h) election, providing their organization’s name and address and taking the election. Filing this form lets charities follow much clearer rules based on how much money they spend on lobbying rather than how much of it they do.What’s more, when nonprofits use this form, their volunteers don’t face any limits on the time they spend lobbying on behalf of organizations.
There’s evidence that the public wants nonprofits to be engaged in this way. According to a recent poll the Independent Sector conducted, 87% of registered voters support nonprofits educating policymakers about the needs of their communities.
We believe these findings indicate a need for more training of nonprofit leaders regarding the importance of advocacy and lobbying tied to their missions.
What’s next
We have several additional related studies underway, including qualitative interviews, that will cast more light on why so few nonprofits engage in advocacy and identify potential solutions. Following the completion of the project, we plan to make the data publicly available for additional research by other scholars of nonprofits. We’re also planning to conduct follow-up surveys to see how these trends evolve.
Lewis Faulk received a research grant from Independent Sector for the Public Engagement Nonprofit Survey (PENS) project. He is a former visiting scholar at Independent Sector and collaborates with Independent Sector on other research and policy focused projects.
Heather MacIndoe received a research grant from Independent Sector for the Public Engagement Nonprofit Survey (PENS) project. She is a current visiting scholar at Independent Sector.
Mirae Kim received a research grant from Independent Sector for this Public Engagement Nonprofit Survey (PENS) project. She is a visiting scholar at Independent Sector and is a non-paid board member at the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action (ARNOVA).
Read These Next
The ‘choking game’ and other challenges amplified by social media can come with deadly consequences
Although these activities have been around for decades, there are signs that some are making a comeback.
Detroit’s reparations task force now has until 2025 to make its report, but going slow with this cha
19 US cities have introduced local reparations initiatives to address historic harms against Black residents.…
Colorado now has one of the nation’s most liberal abortion access laws, but ballot measures to restr
Colorado voters have been asked 10 times since 1970 to vote on abortion ballot measures.